Infantino Blasts World Cup Critics in Open Letter
FIFA President Gianni Infantino published an open letter on Monday fiercely defending the 2026 World Cup, accusing its critics of spreading “hatred and false rumors” and asserting that the tournament was a triumph of unity, safety, and inclusion. The letter, posted on Instagram, comes just over a week after Spain defeated Argentina in the final and amid intensifying scrutiny over visa restrictions, controversial officiating decisions, and allegations of political interference in the sport.
In the letter, Infantino dismissed detractors as being “so consumed by hate and criticism that you missed it all,” according to VRT NWS. “We experienced no violence, no incidents, 100% safety and security, only joy and happiness,” he wrote, painting a picture of a seamlessly organized tournament.
A Tournament Under Fire
The 2026 World Cup — the first to be co-hosted by three nations (the United States, Canada, and Mexico) and the first with an expanded 48-team format — was overshadowed by a series of controversies from the outset. Somali referee Omar Artan was barred from entering the US despite holding a valid visa, while the Iranian national team faced severe travel restrictions amid the ongoing US-Iran conflict, forcing them to relocate their training base from Arizona to Mexico.
Officiating decisions also drew sharp criticism, particularly during Argentina’s victory over Egypt in the Round of 16. But the most explosive controversy centered on US striker Folarin Balogun, who received a red card against Bosnia and Herzegovina during the Round of 32. FIFA controversially suspended Balogun’s automatic one-match ban under Article 27 of its Disciplinary Code after US President Donald Trump personally called Infantino to lobby for the decision, as The Guardian reported.
Infantino’s Defense
While the open letter did not address specific cases directly, Infantino broadly defended FIFA’s handling of disciplinary matters. “Potentially mistaken red or yellow cards or subsequent decisions not to ban players in certain situations are routine and widely accepted in some of the biggest leagues worldwide,” he argued. “It’s curious that the same countries employing these practices are the ones criticising.”
On visa issues, Infantino sought to minimize the scale of the problem. “You mentioned the few people denied visas and overlooked the millions who were approved, from all parts of the world,” he wrote. He insisted that the Iranian team “entered the United States without incident or conflict” and received visas “because football is about peace. It’s not about politics.”
Infantino also invoked the participation of teams from conflict-affected nations. “When football brought Haiti to the world, a country that many cannot or choose not to visit, it might be time to set aside your pens and keyboards and show some respect to the teams that played,” he said, according to Al Jazeera.
Growing Calls for Accountability
Infantino’s combative letter arrives amid mounting pressure from multiple fronts. Former FIFA President Sepp Blatter and La Liga chief Javier Tebas have both called for Infantino to resign, with Tebas claiming FIFA is “destroying football.” A human rights complaint filed by the group FairSquare with the International Olympic Committee — alleging that Infantino breached rules on political neutrality by supporting Trump — was rejected by the IOC on July 24, which ruled the matter fell outside its Ethics Commission’s jurisdiction.
Meanwhile, European political leaders, including Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, publicly mocked FIFA’s handling of the Balogun case. England head coach Thomas Tuchel warned the decision set a “dangerous precedent,” and Belgium’s coach Rudi Garcia likened it to an “April Fools’ Day joke.”
A Polarizing Figure
The open letter draws a direct line back to Infantino’s widely criticized remarks ahead of the 2022 Qatar World Cup, when he declared: “Today I feel Qatari. Today I feel Arabic. Today I feel African. Today I feel gay. Today I feel disabled. Today I feel a migrant worker.” The Guardian noted the parallel, suggesting a pattern of confrontational communication from the FIFA chief when his organization faces criticism.
What Lies Ahead
The letter is unlikely to placate Infantino’s critics. Human rights groups, European football officials, and political leaders have signalled ongoing concern about FIFA’s governance and independence. The Balogun case, in particular, has raised fundamental questions about whether heads of state can influence sporting discipline — a precedent that many in the football world find troubling. With calls for Infantino’s resignation growing louder and the fallout from the World Cup’s controversies still settling, the battle for the soul of global football’s governing body is far from over.